We use cookies to collect and analyse information on site performance and usage to improve and customise your experience, where applicable. View our Cookies Policy. Click Accept and continue to use our website or Manage to review and update your preferences.

Procedure on default of defence

New Rules of the Superior Courts come into operation on 13 November.

Published:

rules of the superior courts

S.I. No. 490 of 2021, Rules of the Superior Courts (Procedure on Default) 2021, aims to reduce the number of court hearings in cases where there is a motion to seek judgment in default of defence and to standardise the time periods for delivering certain pleadings.

A note published by the Courts Service outlines the changes made by these rules:

  • The new rules standardise the time for delivery of a statement of claim by a plaintiff to eight weeks from service of the summons.
  • The new rules standardise the time for delivery of defence in all cases to eight weeks. The time currently prescribed for the delivery of a defence in non personal injury cases is 28 days and this time is not often achieved in practice.
  • The current system for motions for judgment for failure to deliver a defence involves two motions (and at least one adjournment) before judgment is given, and imposes significantly on court time.
  • The new rules propose one court hearing. Where the court extends time for delivery of the defence, the only order to be made would be an “Unless Order”. Judgment is to be entered for the plaintiff except where an extension of time is in the interests of justice. If an extension is warranted, the court will confirm the extended period and order that if the defence is not delivered within that time, judgment will be entered for the plaintiff without a need for any further application to the court.
  • The current rules are amended to make it clear that the court is empowered to grant further relief claimed without the need to set the matter down for assessment or further determination.
  • Where judgment has been obtained in default of appearance, the court is already empowered to set aside the judgment “upon such terms as may be just”. The new rules specifically set out the established tests for same.
  • The new rules provide that a plaintiff must give the defendant a 28 day "warning letter" which is a notice of intention to seek judgment in default of appearance. The new rules also require that, in all applications for judgment in default of appearance, the plaintiff must serve the motion on the defendant. This should ensure that defendants are not taken by surprise in applications for judgement in default of appearance and should reduce the number of applications to set aside judgment obtained in default.

Practitioners should note that the new rules apply to proceedings whether commenced before or after the commencement date.