We use cookies to collect and analyse information on site performance and usage to improve and customise your experience, where applicable. View our Cookies Policy. Click Accept and continue to use our website or Manage to review and update your preferences.


SRA’s proposal on PII sparks ‘unintended consequences’ concern
Law Society of England and Wales President I Stephanie Boyce

08 Jun 2021 / regulation Print

SRA's PII proposal sparks cyber-loss concern

The Law Society of England and Wales has said it cannot support a proposal from the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) aimed at dealing with insurers’ concerns about cyber-related risks.

The society said it backed a consultation being carried out by the SRA on proposed changes to the minimum terms and conditions (MTCs) for professional indemnity insurance (PII) policies.

The body, however, does not support a new clause drafted by the SRA that excludes from cover any cyber-related first-party losses – that affect only the law firm – while confirming that third-party losses remain within the scope of MTCs.

Indemnify law firms

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: “We support the SRA’s commitment to ensuring the MTCs won’t exclude any liability of the insurer to indemnify a law firm against any civil liability claim, and we encourage the regulator to remain focused on consumer protection when considering other policy changes concerning indemnification.

“We do, however, have some significant concerns about the possibility of coverage disputes between the provider of a firm’s cyber-insurance and the provider of their mandatory PII.

“Therefore, we cannot support the implementation of the new exclusion clause,” she said.

President Boyce said the society would prefer the SRA to introduce wording affirming that solicitors’ MTC-compliant PII covers all cyber-risks, including first-party losses.

Exclusion clause

“An unintended consequence of the new exclusion clause may mean that firms will feel compelled to purchase cyber-insurance from the same underwriter which provides their mandatory PII, further limiting the insurance options available to our members,” she added, warning that some smaller firms may feel forced to close if they could not buy cyber-insurance.

“Unless these issues can be resolved, the proposals set out in this consultation would present substantial new risks to our members and the consumers of their legal services,” President Boyce said.

Yesterday,  the Law Society of England and Wales said that the spring 2021 PII renewal season saw law firms pay an average of 30% more for their cover.

A Law Society spokeswoman said: “We previously warned firms could expect increases of 30% for their PII. Now, it seems it has happened.

“The legal profession is operating in a hard market, but the situation is being made worse for our members by a significant minority of firms producing claims that exceed the premiums raised by insurers. 

“This situation is not sustainable, so it is essential that members – and those doing conveyancing work in particular – take steps to review their risk management practices and ensure these are adequate to avoid all but the most improbable claims."

Gazette Desk
Gazette.ie is the daily legal news site of the Law Society of Ireland