We use cookies to collect and analyse information on site performance and usage to improve and customise your experience, where applicable. View our Cookies Policy. Click Accept and continue to use our website or Manage to review and update your preferences.


Appeal over ‘inexcusable’ ruling delay dismissed
London's Old Bailey Pic: Shutterstock

21 May 2021 / global news Print

Appeal over ‘inexcusable’ delay in ruling dismissed

The Court of Appeal in London has dismissed an appeal made on the basis that the ruling in question was handed down 34 months after the conclusion of the trial, reports the Law Society Gazette of England and Wales.

The Gazette says Lord Justice Arnold accepted the delay in Dansingani & Anor v Canara Bank was “inordinate and inexcusable”, but he found no reason to doubt the findings made, and said that the judge in the case had been correct.

The court heard that the trial into a dispute about a banking loan lasted 14 days, ending on 31 January 2017.

The judgment was provided to the parties by Judge Dight, sitting as a High Court judge, in draft on 29 November 2019.

Two complaints

The appellants made two main complaints about the judgment: that the delay was a serious procedural or other irregularity which rendered the decisions against them unjust; and that, as a result of the delay, the judge failed to properly analyse the evidence.

It was accepted that the Court of Appeal could not substitute its own findings for those of the judge, but it was argued that there should be a retrial.

The delayed judgment ran to 300 paragraphs and 141 pages and Lord Justice Arnold said that it appeared to contain a “very careful and detailed consideration” of the issues.

He stressed that the court should not downplay the seriousness of a judge’s dereliction of duty to give judgment in a timely manner.

'Even-handed'

He also noted that the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office had already issued the judge with formal advice after a finding that the delay was “unacceptable”.

According to the Gazette, the appeal court rejected submissions that the judge had been one-sided in his treatment of witnesses or failed to properly assess their evidence.

Each of the criticisms about the judge’s approach was dismissed in turn by the appeal court, which found his approach to be “even-handed”.

"Despite the inordinate and inexcusable delay in delivering the judgment, there is no reason to doubt the findings the judge made,” said Lord Justice Arnold.

Gazette Desk
Gazette.ie is the daily legal news site of the Law Society of Ireland