We use cookies to collect and analyse information on site performance and usage to improve and customise your experience, where applicable. View our Cookies Policy. Click Accept and continue to use our website or Manage to review and update your preferences.

EU court upholds commission’s Intel decision
(Pic: Court of Justice of the European Union)

10 Dec 2025 cjeu Print

EU court upholds commission’s Intel decision

An EU court has upheld a European Commission decision to fine chip maker Intel for anti-competitive behaviour, but has reduced the financial penalty by €140 million.

Intel had challenged a 2023 decision by the commission to fine the firm more than €376 million for restrictions imposed on HP, Acer, and Lenovo concerning the use of processors from rival AMD.

The commission’s 2023 action followed the partial annulment by the EU courts of a 2009 decision against Intel, which involved a fine of more than €1 billion.

The EU’s General Court found today (10 December), however, that the commission remained competent to impose penalties for the so-called ‘naked’ restrictions imposed on certain computer manufacturers that had not been annulled by the courts.

‘Enforce previous judgments’

The court found that the existence of these restrictions had already been upheld by the EU courts and that the commission did not need to show again that it had jurisdiction or redefine a new infringement.

“It was required only to enforce the previous judgments by recalculating the fine on the basis solely of the conduct still at issue,” the judges stated.

While not calling into question the lawfulness of the 2023 decision, the court ruled that the amount of the fine ought to be “refined”, by taking greater account of the relatively limited number of computers affected by the restrictions and the timing of the anti-competitive practices.

As a result, it reduced the amount of the fine to just over €237 million.

Gazette Desk
Gazette.ie is the daily legal news site of the Law Society of Ireland

Copyright © 2025 Law Society Gazette. The Law Society is not responsible for the content of external sites – see our Privacy Policy.