We use cookies to collect and analyse information on site performance and usage to improve and customise your experience, where applicable. View our Cookies Policy. Click Accept and continue to use our website or Manage to review and update your preferences.


Strictly necessary cookies

Cookie name Duration Cookie purpose
ASP.NET_SessionId Session This cookie holds the current session id (OPPassessment only)
.ASPXANONYMOUS 2 Months Authentication to the site
LSI 1 Year To remember cookie preference for Law Society websites (www.lawsociety.ie, www.legalvacancies.ie, www.gazette.ie)
FTGServer 1 Hour Website content ( /CSS , /JS, /img )
_ga 2 Years Google Analytics
_gat Session Google Analytics
_git 1 Day Google Analytics
AptifyCSRFCookie Session Aptify CSRF Cookie
CSRFDefenseInDepthToken Session Aptify defence cookie
EB5Cookie Session Aptify eb5 login cookie

Functional cookies

Cookie name Duration Cookie purpose
Zendesk Local Storage Online Support
platform.twitter.com Local Storage Integrated Twitter feed

Marketing cookies

Cookie name Duration Cookie purpose
fr 3 Months Facebook Advertising - Used for Facebook Marketing
_fbp 3 months Used for facebook Marketing
NI solicitors ‘firmly reject’ British rights bill
Pic: Law Society of Northern Ireland

04 Aug 2022 / human rights Print

NI solicitors ‘firmly reject’ British rights bill

The Law Society of Northern Ireland’s Human Rights and Equality Group (HREG) has said that it “firmly rejects” the British government’s Bill of Rights Bill.

The new bill would end the requirement of British courts to follow human-rights rulings from the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in Strasbourg, making the UK Supreme Court the top judicial decision-making body.

It would replace the Human Rights Act, which was brought in in 1998 to enable people to rely on rights contained in the European Convention on Human Rights.

Under the new bill, Britain would remain a member of the convention and the Strasbourg court, which is outside of the EU court structures.

Impact on Northern Ireland

The Law Society of Northern Ireland committee had already stated its belief that the proposed changes would have the effect of weakening or reducing rights, and had urged the British government to rethink its proposals.

“Unfortunately, having now reviewed the resulting draft legislation in detail, it is clear the government has ignored those concerns,” the HREG said.

The group said that, while it had many concerns over the draft legislation, its main worry was the impact on the rule of law in Northern Ireland.

“This legislation diminishes human rights, and weakens the ability for citizens to hold the state accountable for breaching human rights,” the group stated.

New PM ‘an opportunity’

It added that it shared the view of former President of the Supreme Court Baroness Hale, who suggested in a recent lecture in Belfast that the bill was “a watering down” of human-rights protections in Northern Ireland, and “the reverse” of what was envisaged in the Good Friday Agreement.

The HREG said that it would monitor the passage of the bill, adding that a new British prime minister and cabinet presented “an opportunity to reflect” on the widespread concerns about the draft legislation.

“In the meantime, we will continue to raise our concerns about this retrograde step for human rights protections in NI and across the UK,” the HREG concluded.

Gazette Desk
Gazette.ie is the daily legal news site of the Law Society of Ireland