We use cookies to collect and analyse information on site performance and usage to improve and customise your experience, where applicable. View our Cookies Policy. Click Accept and continue to use our website or Manage to review and update your preferences.


Strictly necessary cookies

Cookie name Duration Cookie purpose
ASP.NET_SessionId Session This cookie holds the current session id (OPPassessment only)
.ASPXANONYMOUS 2 Months Authentication to the site
LSI 1 Year To remember cookie preference for Law Society websites (www.lawsociety.ie, www.legalvacancies.ie, www.gazette.ie)
FTGServer 1 Hour Website content ( /CSS , /JS, /img )
_ga 2 Years Google Analytics
_gat Session Google Analytics
_git 1 Day Google Analytics
AptifyCSRFCookie Session Aptify CSRF Cookie
CSRFDefenseInDepthToken Session Aptify defence cookie
EB5Cookie Session Aptify eb5 login cookie

Functional cookies

Cookie name Duration Cookie purpose
Zendesk Local Storage Online Support
platform.twitter.com Local Storage Integrated Twitter feed

Marketing cookies

Cookie name Duration Cookie purpose
fr 3 Months Facebook Advertising - Used for Facebook Marketing
_fbp 3 months Used for facebook Marketing
Law firms should collect data on employee status

01 Jun 2022 / employment Print

Law firms should collect data on employee status

Irish-trained lawyer Ronan MacSweeney, who now lives in Australia, and trainee Nina Jayne Carroll (Matheson) spoke at this week’s Shrink Me session on the psychology of belonging (30 May).

The Law Society’s John Lunney asked whether diversity and inclusion could be treated as a box-ticking item by law firms.

MacSweeney responded that ticking the boxes was acceptable, in that it could start a conversation.

The motives for why organisations got involved were unimportant, he said; what mattered was the delivery of outcomes.

MacSweeney said that there was a business case for wider inclusion, in that people who felt valued were more likely to remain as an employee.

Diversity of people also led to diversity of perspective and, therefore, a wider spectrum of solutions, he added.

The people-centric reason for diversity and inclusion was that it was the right thing to do, MacSweeney stated. 

Nina Jayne Carroll said that diversity initiatives should ideally come together in a natural and organic fashion.

Diversity in client base was also important, because it brought a different perspective and energy to the law firm, she said. 

MacSweeney said that if firms did not collect visible data on the make-up and composition of employees, it was very hard to drive the case for a more inclusive work environment.

Evidence

“Ultimately, if you want to make a case, you have to have the evidence to prove it,” he said.

MacSweeney said that the purchasing power of big law could be used, by asking those tendering to provide services for their diversity and inclusion (D+I) data.

 

Gazette Desk
Gazette.ie is the daily legal news site of the Law Society of Ireland