We use cookies to collect and analyse information on site performance and usage to improve and customise your experience, where applicable. View our Cookies Policy. Click Accept and continue to use our website or Manage to review and update your preferences.


Strictly necessary cookies

Cookie name Duration Cookie purpose
ASP.NET_SessionId Session This cookie holds the current session id (OPPassessment only)
.ASPXANONYMOUS 2 Months Authentication to the site
LSI 1 Year To remember cookie preference for Law Society websites (www.lawsociety.ie, www.legalvacancies.ie, www.gazette.ie)
FTGServer 1 Hour Website content ( /CSS , /JS, /img )
_ga 2 Years Google Analytics
_gat Session Google Analytics
_git 1 Day Google Analytics
AptifyCSRFCookie Session Aptify CSRF Cookie
CSRFDefenseInDepthToken Session Aptify defence cookie
EB5Cookie Session Aptify eb5 login cookie

Functional cookies

Cookie name Duration Cookie purpose
Zendesk Local Storage Online Support
platform.twitter.com Local Storage Integrated Twitter feed

Marketing cookies

Cookie name Duration Cookie purpose
fr 3 Months Facebook Advertising - Used for Facebook Marketing
_fbp 3 months Used for facebook Marketing
EU members ‘can be sued over air quality’
Luxembourg's Court of Justice of the EU

06 May 2022 / EU Print

EU members ‘can be sued over air quality’

An opinion issued by the EU’s top court has found that member states could be held liable for health damage to individuals caused by air pollution.

Advocate General Juliane Kokott was giving her non-binding opinion at the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in a case taken by a resident of the Paris region. 

He is seeking €2.1 million in compensation from the French state because, he claims, the increasing air pollution in that city area has damaged his health.

He argues that France is liable for that damage because it has not ensured compliance with the pollution limits that apply uniformly throughout the EU.

Compensation

The Administrative Court of Appeal, Versailles, which is hearing the dispute, had asked the CJEU for its view on whether, and under what conditions, individuals could claim compensation from a state for health damage caused by infringement of the EU limits. 

The advocate general said that such infringements of air-quality rules under EU law might give rise

to entitlement to compensation from the state.

Her opinion stated that the EU rules were intended to confer rights on individuals, by protecting their health.

Causal link

She added, however, that proving a direct causal link between a serious breach of the rules on air quality, and specific damage to health, would pose problems in enforcing claims for compensation.

The injured party would have to prove that he or she had stayed, for a long period of time, in

an environment in which air-quality rules had been breached and would also have to show that the damage to health could be linked to the relevant air pollution in the first place.

Even if these conditions were satisfied, the matter would not end there, the judge stressed.

“Rather, the member state may exonerate itself by proving that such exceedance of the limit values would also have occurred if it had adopted, in good time, air-quality

Gazette Desk
Gazette.ie is the daily legal news site of the Law Society of Ireland