We use cookies to collect and analyse information on site performance and usage to improve and customise your experience, where applicable. View our Cookies Policy. Click Accept and continue to use our website or Manage to review and update your preferences.


Strictly necessary cookies

Cookie name Duration Cookie purpose
ASP.NET_SessionId Session This cookie holds the current session id (OPPassessment only)
.ASPXANONYMOUS 2 Months Authentication to the site
LSI 1 Year To remember cookie preference for Law Society websites (www.lawsociety.ie, www.legalvacancies.ie, www.gazette.ie)
FTGServer 1 Hour Website content ( /CSS , /JS, /img )
_ga 2 Years Google Analytics
_gat Session Google Analytics
_git 1 Day Google Analytics
AptifyCSRFCookie Session Aptify CSRF Cookie
CSRFDefenseInDepthToken Session Aptify defence cookie
EB5Cookie Session Aptify eb5 login cookie

Functional cookies

Cookie name Duration Cookie purpose
Zendesk Local Storage Online Support
platform.twitter.com Local Storage Integrated Twitter feed

Marketing cookies

Cookie name Duration Cookie purpose
fr 3 Months Facebook Advertising - Used for Facebook Marketing
_fbp 3 months Used for facebook Marketing
Disruption ahead after High Court ruling on garda case handling
Pic: RollingNews.ie

01 Jun 2022 / courts Print

Disruption after High Court garda case-handling ruling

In a High Court ruling yesterday (31 May) Ms Justice Bolger overturned a rule under which a huge volume of criminal prosecutions were presented by a garda unconnected to the original investigation.

Most cases at a special sitting of Galway District Court were adjourned, because the decision means that Garda Sergeant court presenters may no longer manage criminal prosecutions in the District Court.

Adjourned cases

District Court President Mr Justice Paul Kelly has said that many cases may have to be adjourned, and more gardaí may have to attend courts, as a result.

The District Court rule which permits any garda to present a prosecution is an impermissible amendment of section 8.2 of the Garda Síochána Act that limits that “significant right” to the garda who initiated the prosecution, the High Court has declared.

The judge said that the clause, which permits a garda to initiate and conduct a District Court prosecution on behalf of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), means that an officer must have both initiated and conducted the prosecution to have a right of audience before the District Court.

The right of audience conferred on members of specified groups, including gardaí, is not part of court practice and procedures, but is “more significant, and akin to the administration of justice”, Ms Justice Bolger said.

In a comment to The Irish Times, District Court president Judge Paul Kelly said that he was awaiting the DPP’s response, which might be to appeal, but that, in the meantime, the High Court decision was stating the law.

The Law Society is aware of the judgment and is currently in the process of analysing it. “In the meantime, we will await a response to the judgment by the Director of Public Prosecutions, and advise our members accordingly," the Society said.

Frontline duties

Garda sources said that resources would be affected as a result, with some members moving away from frontline duties.

The 2018 Commission on the Future of Policing said that a new State prosecution service should take charge of bringing cases to court.

The report insists on a binary approach to police investigation and criminal prosecution, which it believes are two separate jobs, as is the case in comparable jurisdictions.

It calls for the immediate cessation of police prosecutions in court, because gardaí “are not trained to the level of the opposing defence lawyer”. 

It says current practice is “enormously wasteful” of policing resources, and takes gardaí away from their core duties. 

Administrative challenges

In her ruling, Ms Justice Bolger said she did not disregard the administrative challenges in managing the system of District Court criminal prosecutions.

She said, however, that efficiency needs could not override the fact that the rule went impermissibly beyond what is permitted by section 8.2.

The legal issue arose in relation to a 2021 prosecution, in which a man denied a charge of possessing cannabis.

A Garda Sergeant, who said he was “instructed” by the prosecuting garda, told District Judge Miriam Walsh that he was not ready to proceed, but that facts could be provided if there was a guilty plea.

After the defendant’s solicitor argued that the sergeant had no right of audience before the District Court, Judge Walsh referred legal issues to the High Court for determination.

Notice party

The Attorney General was a notice party to the High Court case.

Lawyers for the DPP and AG argued that the revised interpretation of the District Court rules would result in a fundamental overhaul of the courts presenter system operating in the District Courts. 

Ms Justice Bolger ruled that the sergeant who had appeared in the case had no right of audience, which, she held, was limited to gardaí who made the first arrest and charge.

Gazette Desk
Gazette.ie is the daily legal news site of the Law Society of Ireland