We use cookies to collect and analyse information on site performance and usage to improve and customise your experience, where applicable. View our Cookies Policy. Click Accept and continue to use our website or Manage to review and update your preferences.

Strictly necessary cookies

Cookie name Duration Cookie purpose
ASP.NET_SessionId Session This cookie holds the current session id (OPPassessment only)
.ASPXANONYMOUS 2 Months Authentication to the site
LSI 1 Year To remember cookie preference for Law Society websites (www.lawsociety.ie, www.legalvacancies.ie, www.gazette.ie)
FTGServer 1 Hour Website content ( /CSS , /JS, /img )
_ga 2 Years Google Analytics
_gat Session Google Analytics
_git 1 Day Google Analytics
AptifyCSRFCookie Session Aptify CSRF Cookie
CSRFDefenseInDepthToken Session Aptify defence cookie
EB5Cookie Session Aptify eb5 login cookie

Functional cookies

Cookie name Duration Cookie purpose
Zendesk Local Storage Online Support
platform.twitter.com Local Storage Integrated Twitter feed

Marketing cookies

Cookie name Duration Cookie purpose
fr 3 Months Facebook Advertising - Used for Facebook Marketing
_fbp 3 months Used for facebook Marketing
‘Triggered’ social worker wins damages over criticism of her conduct
European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg Pic: Shutterstock

24 Jun 2021 / EU Print

‘Triggered’ social worker wins ECHR damages

The European Court of Human Rights has ordered Britain to pay damages to a social worker who became aware of criticism of her conduct only when a family court judge delivered an oral judgment at the end of a hearing.

The social worker went to the Court of Appeal, which found that the process by which the judge arrived at his criticisms was “manifestly unfair”, and set aside the adverse findings.

The Strasbourg court has ruled that the social worker suffered prejudice, personally and professionally, that the Court of Appeal’s judgment did not remedy, the Law Gazette of England and Wales has reported.

The case relates to childcare proceedings in which the social worker was called as a professional witness.

After the oral judgment was delivered, but prior to it being finalised, the family court judge held a series of hearings that addressed submissions by the social worker.

Adverse findings

Some changes were made to the text, but the adverse findings remained, and the decision not to grant her anonymity was maintained.

The judge directed his judgment to be sent to the social worker's local authority employer, and advised that it be shared with relevant professional bodies.


A psychiatrist reported that receiving the family court judge’s findings had been a “highly traumatic experience” for the social worker, triggering post-traumatic stress disorder.

The social worker won a total of €24,000 in non-pecuniary damages and €60,000 in costs and expenses.

Gazette Desk
Gazette.ie is the daily legal news site of the Law Society of Ireland